Friday, 27 May 2016

GROUND WATER CONTERMINATION

Groundwater Contamination



Over 50% of the world population depends on groundwater for drinking water. Groundwater is one of our most important sources of water for irrigation. Unfortunately, groundwater is susceptible to pollution by human activities.






Potential Threats
Chemical discharged into water system

Groundwater contamination occurs when man-made products such as gasoline, oil, road salts and chemicals get into the groundwater and cause it to become unsafe and unfit for human use.Materials from the land's surface can move through the soil and end up in the groundwater. For example, pesticides and fertilizers can find their way into groundwater supplies over time. Road salt, toxic substances from mining sites, and used motor oil also gets into groundwater. Moreso Untreated waste from septic tanks and toxic chemicals from underground storage tanks and leaky landfills also contaminate groundwater.

Dangers Of Contaminated Groundwater
Drinking contaminated groundwater

Drinking contaminated groundwater is highly hazardous to human and animal health. Diseases such as hepatitis and dysentery may be caused by contamination from septic tank waste. Poisoning may be caused by toxins that have leached into well water supplies. Other long term effects such as certain types of cancer also result from exposure to polluted water.





SOURCES OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION

Storage Tanks
Leaking Storage tank

Storage tanks May contain gasoline, oil, chemicals, or other types of liquids and they can either be above or below ground. There are estimated to be over 10 million storage tanks buried in the United States and over time the tanks can corrode, crack and develop leaks. If the contaminants leak out and get into the groundwater, serious contamination can occur.
 


 



 Septic Systems

An Improper Septic System

Onsite wastewater disposal systems used by homes, offices or other buildings that are not connected to a city sewer system. Septic systems are designed to slowly drain away human waste underground at a slow, harmless rate. An improperly designed, located, constructed, or maintained septic system can leak bacteria, viruses, household chemicals, and other contaminants into the groundwater causing serious problems.
   



Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste
Hazardous Waste
Hazardous Waste
In the U.S. today, there are thought to be over 20,000 known abandoned and uncontrolled hazardous waste sites and the numbers grow every year. Hazardous waste sites can lead to groundwater contamination if there are barrels or other containers laying around that are full of hazardous materials. If there is a leak, these contaminants can eventually make their way down through the soil and into the groundwater.
  




Landfills

Landfill Site


Landfills are the places that our garbage is taken to be buried. Landfills should have a protective bottom layer to prevent contaminants from getting into the water. However, if there is no layer or it is cracked, contaminants from the landfill (car battery acid, paint, household cleaners, etc.) will make their way down into the groundwater.
   











Chemicals and Road Salts
Workers applying Road Salts

The widespread use of chemicals and road salts is another source of groundwater contamination. Chemicals include products used on lawns and farm fields to kill weeds and insects and to fertilize plants, and other products used in homes and businesses. When it rains, these chemicals are washed into the ground and eventually into the water. Road salts are used in the wintertime to put melt ice on roads to keep cars from sliding around. When the ice melts, the salt gets washed off the roads and eventually ends up in the water.
  

Atmospheric Contaminants
Industrial Exhaustion

Groundwater is part of the hydrological cycle, contaminants in other parts of the cycle, such as the atmosphere or bodies of surface water will eventually eventually be transferred into our groundwater supplies.

We should apply more caution in our waste disposal procedures.

Thursday, 26 May 2016

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF INTERNET


 Is the Internet Affecting our Environment?

You have change your truck to an economy car, your 100-watts for CFLs, and your garbage disposal for the added trouble of a compost bucket, just for reducing carbon emissions and saving the world.  But another global warming culprit you might not have considered is your computer. More specifically, the internet surfing that you do with that computer.


In 2009, Harvard physicist Alex Wissner-Gross calculated the carbon emissions associated with individual Google searches. Although negligible on their own, the cumulative effect of all that internet time is a “definite environmental impact” that has long gone overlooked.

 Are you thinking is a joke? Take a look at some of the facts:

1.    Every second someone is browsing a simple web site, roughly 20 milligrams of CO2 are generated. Comparably, an air-freighted orange generates 1kg, or     one million milligrams, of carbon emissions.

2.    35 billion minutes are logged online every month from users around the world, according to data compiled earlier this year by Go-Gulf.com.
        According to anti-virus software firm McAfee, the electricity used to transmit the trillions of spam sent over the course of one year is equivalent to the amount of electricity needed to power more than two million homes. Simultaneously, the carbon output equates to that of three million cars!
  
3.    The global IT industry generates as much greenhouse gas as the world’s airlines according to research firm Gartner.

The reality is crystal clear.  When you hop onto Google and type in a search, the results don’t just appear magically out of nowhere. All of that information on the web isn’t simply floating out in the great unknown waiting to be plucked.

Instead, your query is shot through massive data center buildings that house thousands upon thousands of servers, each of which store some of the information available on the web. Each of those servers also requires a considerable amount of energy to function. The more data they have to filter through and subsequently transmit, the more energy is used, the more greenhouse gas emissions are generated.

All of this leads us to believe that our IT industry leaders play a pivotal role in the future of our environment and they need to take that responsibility seriously. So far, organizations like Google seem to be responding appropriately, taking steps to minimize, if not reduce, their environmental impact. For instance, after having spent nearly $1 billion in renewable energy methods, Google data centers use 50% less energy than typical data centers. Yahoo also seems to be taking their duties in stride, making Newsweek’s top 10 list of greenest companies in America due to their efforts of green volunteer initiatives, energy efficient data centers, and their sponsored site Yahoo! Green.

But while these specific industry leaders have taken a stand, what about other search engines and tech organizations? After all, even the lesser-known firms still wield significant power over the future of our Earth. Thus, while it may be no small goal for every web-based firm to respond to their environmental impact, it is certainly a necessary one.

So, what can be done to reduce the environmental impact of the internet? Many of the companies involved in building and operating the data centers, the brains of the internet, have been working on improving data center efficiency for several years. Processors have increased in computing power, while decreasing in energy demand, and new ways have been developed to keep massive server farms cool. Server farms can be located near hydroelectric facilities or other sources of renewable energy and the can be built in the arctic circle to take advantage of natural cooling.


On an individual level it is important to simply be aware that using the internet is not "carbon neutral" and don't leave your computer on when you aren't using it.

Wednesday, 25 May 2016

THE ENVIRONMENTAL COST OF TOMATOES IN YOUR FOOD

The Environmental Cost of the Tomato


It takes less energy to import tomatoes from Spain than to grow them in Britain, says a report which claims that "food miles" are not always a bad thing. Food has been traveling longer distances between the farmer and the consumer for the past 50 years, according to the independent report commissioned by the Government.

The increase is a result of the globalization of the food industry, the trend towards bigger farms at home, the centralization of supermarkets' distribution networks and out-of-town shopping by car.

The study on food miles carried out for the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs by AEA Technology says food transport is a significant and growing source of road accident, noise and pollution . According to the report the environmental and social costs of food transport are £9 billion a year. More than half of this (£5 billion) is due to road congestion and £2 billion is due to accidents - more than 300 people are killed transporting food every year.

Yet food miles are not always a valid test of environmental friendliness, says the report. They are "too simple a concept" to capture the impact of its transportation. For example, the report says, it takes less energy to import tomatoes from Spain, where the climate is warmer and no heating is used, than to grow them out of season in gas-heated greenhouses in Britain.
Gas heated greenhouse
The environmental cost of importing organic wheat is lower than producing wheat by conventional methods at home - provided that not too much fuel is used moving it around when it gets here.

The report shows that the mode of transport makes a great difference. Large tonnages of food can be imported from far away by sea at low environmental cost. Air transport, however, produces high amounts of pollution for the low tonnages of goods it brings. Food air transport has more than doubled since 1992, and represents 11 per cent of all carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere.

Transporting tomatoes
 Yet the highest mileage traveled by food is in the car. Consumers now drive an average of nearly 900 miles a year to shop for food.

The bulk of all emissions comes from heavy goods vehicles. Carbon dioxide emissions from food transport increased by 12 per cent from 1992 to 2002. By contrast, local air pollution from nitrogen oxides and particulates declined over this period.

Lord Bach, the food and farming minister, said: "It is clear that organic and seasonally-available food can reduce environmental impacts but that these can be offset by the way they are transported to the consumers." He added: "We don't want to act as a nanny state, but every citizen does have to know the impact of what they are doing."



Vicky Hird, of Friends of the Earth, said: "Asking the food companies to make lorries a bit more efficient is irrelevant when those lorries are making unnecessary journeys.

"To suggest that locally-sourced food may generate more food miles is ludicrous. Locally produced food is far better for food miles, but it must be planned and supported by local and national government to find the most efficient methods."

Tuesday, 24 May 2016

THE UNSEEN COST OF FOSSIL FUELS


                                                The UNSEEN Cost of Fossil Fuels
Fossil fuels—coal, oil, and natural gas—are the world primary source of energy. Some of the costs of using these fuels are obvious, such as the cost of labor to mine for coal or drill for oil, of labor and materials to build energy-generating plants, and of transportation of coal and oil to the plants. These costs are included in our electricity bills or in the purchase price of fuel for cars.But some energy costs are not included in consumer utility or gas bills, nor are they paid for by the companies that produce or sell the energy. These include human health problems caused by air pollution from the burning of coal and oil; damage to land from coal mining and to miners from black lung disease; environmental degradation caused by global warming, acid rain, and water pollution; and national security costs, such as protecting foreign sources of oil.

Since such costs are not direct and difficult to determine, they have conservatively remained outcast to the energy pricing system, and are thus often referred to as externalities. And since the producers and the users of energy do not pay for these costs, society as a whole must pay for them. But this pricing system masks the true costs of fossil fuels and results in damage to human health, the environment, and the economy.

Environmental Impacts of Fossil Fuel Use

Most of the environmental problems our country faces today result from our fossil fuel dependence. These impacts include global warming, air quality deterioration, oil spills, and acid rain.

Global Warming



 Among the gases emitted when fossil fuels are burned, one of the most significant is carbon dioxide, a gas that traps heat in the earth's atmosphere. Over the last 150 years, burning fossil fuels has resulted in more than a 25 percent increase in the amount of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere. Fossil fuels are also implicated in increased levels of atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide, although they are not the major source of these gases.Since the era of rekiable records in the late 1800s, the global average surface temperature has risen 0.5-1.1 degrees Fahrenheit (0.3-0.6 degrees Celsius).

Scientists with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded in a 1995 report that the observed increase in global average temperature over the last century "is unlikely to be entirely natural in origin" and that "the balance of evidence suggests that there is a discernible human influence on global climate."

Climate scientists predict that if carbondioxide levels continue to elevate, the planet will become warmer in the next century. Projected temperature increases will most likely result in a variety of impacts. In coastal areas, sea-level rise due to the warming of the oceans and the melting of glaciers may lead to the inundation of wetlands, river deltas, and even populated areas. Altered weather patterns may result in more extreme weather events. And inland agricultural zones could suffer an increase in the frequency of droughts.

Air Pollution



Clean air is mandatory to life and good health. Many important pollutants are produced by fossil fuel combustion: carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, and hydrocarbons. In addition, total suspended particulates contribute to air pollution, and nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons can combine in the atmosphere to form tropospheric ozone, the major constituent of smog.

Carbon monoxide is a gas produced as a by-product during the incomplete combustion of all fossil fuels. Exposure to carbon monoxide can cause headaches and place additional stress on people with heart disease. Cars and trucks are the primary source of carbon monoxide emissions.

Two oxides of nitrogen, nitrogen dioxide and nitric oxide are formed in combustion. Nitrogen oxides appear as yellowish-brown clouds over many city skylines. They can irritate the lungs, cause bronchitis and pneumonia, and decrease resistance to respiratory infections. They also lead to the formation of smog. The transportation sector is responsible for close to half of the US emissions of nitrogen oxides; power plants produce most of the rest.

Sulfur oxides are produced by the oxidization of the available sulfur in a fuel. Utilities that use coal to generate electricity produce two-thirds of the nation's sulfur dioxide emissions. Nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides are major constituents of acid rain. These gases combine with water vapor in clouds to form sulfuric and nitric acids, which become part of rain and snow. As the acids accumulate, lakes and rivers become too acidic for plant and animal life. Acid rain also affects crops and buildings.

Hydrocarbons are a broad class of pollutants made up of hundreds of specific compounds containing carbon and hydrogen. The simplest hydrocarbon, methane, does not readily react with nitrogen oxides to form smog, but most other hydrocarbons do. Hydrocarbons are emitted from human-made sources such as auto and truck exhaust, evaporation of gasoline and solvents, and petroleum refining.The white haze that can be seen over many cities is tropospheric ozone, or smog. This gas is not released directly into the air; rather, it is formed when ozone precursors mainly non methane hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides react in the presence of heat and sunlight. Human exposure to ozone can produce shortness of breath and, over time, permanent lung damage. Research shows that ozone may be harmful at levels even lower than the current federal air standard. In  addition, it can reduce crop yields.

Finally, fossil fuel use also produces particulates, including dust, soot, smoke, and other suspended matter, which are respiratory irritants. In addition, particulates may contribute to acid rain formation.

Water and Land Pollution


Production, transportation, and use of oil cause water pollution. Oil spills, for example, leave waterways and their surrounding shores uninhabitable for some time. Such spills often result in the loss of plant and animal life. Coal mining also contributes to water pollution. Coal contains pyrite, a sulfur compound; as water washes through mines, this compound forms a dilute acid, which is then washed into nearby rivers and streams.

Coal mining, especially strip mining, affects the area that is being mined. Characteristically, the material closest to the coal is acidic. After the mining is completed, the land will remain barren unless special precautions are taken to ensure that proper topsoil is used when the area is replanted. Materials other than coal are also brought to the surface in the coal mining process, and these are left as solid wastes. As the coal itself is washed, more waste material is left. Finally, as the coal is burned, the remaining ash is left as a waste product.

Thermal Pollution


During the electricity-generation process, burning fossil fuels produce heat energy, some of which is used to generate electricity. Because the process is inefficient, much of the heat is released to the atmosphere or to water that is used as a coolant. Heated air is not a problem, but heated water, once returned to rivers or lakes, can upset the aquatic ecosystem.




National Security Impacts of Fossil Fuel Use


Our nation's fossil fuel dependence means that, to ensure our supply, we may be forced to protect foreign sources of oil. The Persian Gulf War is a perfect example: US troops were sent to the Gulf in part to guard against a possible cutoff of our oil supply. Although the war is over, through taxes we continue topay for protecting oil supplies with our armed forces. Not only were billions of dollars spent in protecting the oil, but lives were lost as well.

Reliance on Middle East oil also creates a danger of fuel price shocks or shortages if supply is disrupted. Today, about one-third of US oil comes from the
Middle East. By 2030, if energy policy is not changed it might increase to two-third.